NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday referred to a Constitution Bench the battle between the Centre and Delhi government because of an issue of control over bureaucrats in the Capital.
A three-judge Bench led by Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana said the tension between the Union and Delhi governments is mainly over the ‘services’ or bureaucracy required an authoritative pronouncement by a five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court.
In the year 2018, a Constitution Bench held that the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi was bound by the “aid and advice” of the popularly-elected Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government and both had to work harmoniously and corporate with each other. It had noted that there was no room for anarchy or absolutism in a democracy.
The Delhi government had compared its predicament without power over the ‘services’ to that of a king without a kingdom. The situation was such that a “democratic representative government” had to get the approval of the Lieutenant Governor to appoint a Health Secretary or a Commerce Secretary, it had argued.
The 2018 judgment had made it clear that the powers of the Centre and the Delhi government were collective and coextensive, senior advocate A.M. Singhvi, for the Delhi government, had submitted.
Senior Lawyer Said, “What collective responsibility will the Delhi govt. have without the power to control the transfers and postings of the officers? Federalism is itself being eroded,”
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre, had argued in favor of referring the issue to a Constitution Bench.
The Centre had argued that Delhi, the nation’s capital and a sprawling metropolis, should be under its control. Delhi could not be left to the “small mercies and smaller resources” of a State legislature, the Centre reasoned.
On February 14, 2019, a Supreme Court Bench of Justices A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan (both retired) gave a split opinion on the question of control over ‘services’ in the Capital.
While Justice Bhushan had held that the Delhi government had no power over ‘services’, Justice Sikri, who was the lead judge on the Bench, took the middle path.
Justice Sikri had concluded that files on the transfers and postings of officers in the rank of secretary, head of the department, and joint secretary could be directly submitted to the Lieutenant Governor. As far as DANICS (Delhi Andamans Nicobar Islands Civil Service) cadre was concerned, the files could be processed through the Council of Ministers led by the Chief Minister to the Lieutenant Governor, Justice Sikri wrote. Again, in case of a difference of opinion, the Lieutenant Governor prevailed.
The Delhi government has also separately sought the quashing of amendments to the ‘Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) Act’ and 13 Rules of the ‘Transaction of Business of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Rules, 1993’.
It has contended that the amendments violate the doctrine of the basic structure of the Constitution and that the Centre, through these changes, has given more power to the Lieutenant Governor than the elected government of the people of Delhi.
We hope that this article helped you in some way or another! For more such information, follow us on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube, or simply subscribe to our newsletter
Also. Read – https://indianlawinfo.in/bjp-spokesperson-tajinder-singh-bagga-arrested/
DOWNLOAD OUR FREE LEGAL MAGAZINE – LAW MANTHAN 1ST EDITION
(MARCH – APRIL 2022)
