Recently, In the case of Sunil Lora v State of Rajasthan, The Supreme Court refused to accept a marriage certificate issued by Arya Samaj while considering the bail application of an accused charged under offenses relating to kidnap and rape of a minor under Sections 363, 366A, 384, 376(2)(n), 384 IPC and Section 5(L)/6 of the POCSO Act.
Rejecting the submissions of the counsel that the prosecutrix who had leveled allegations of rape was a major girl and marriage between the petitioner and the prosecutrix had already taken place at Arya Samaj, the vacation bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and BV Nagarathna said :
“Arya Samaj has no business giving marriage certificates. This is the work of authorities. Show the real certificate.”
it may be noted that the Supreme Court on April 4 had agreed to hear a plea challenging a Madhya Pradesh High Court order directing Madhya Bharat Arya Pratinidhi Sabha (“Sabha”), an Arya Samaj organization to comply with the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 (“SMA”) while solemnizing marriages.
A Bench headed by Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy issued notice as well as stayed the operation of the High Court order, wherein the Sabha was directed to amend its Guidelines by incorporating the provisions of Section 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the SMA, within a month.
DOWNLOAD OUR FREE LEGAL MAGAZINE – LAW MANTHAN 1ST EDITION